The table graphics can be customized with 4 different styles that I particularly liked. Historically, however, the level of poor gameplay that players at Poker seemed to take it was startling. You will get the bulk of your bonus 00 in the casino, however. Maybe this help you to make a final decision. Well I have only play at Pokerstars And i think is the best for tournaments Also the software is super the best of all poker sites I think.. Actually I'm banned on poker like others players from Poland, therefore playing on PokerStars.
My choice is pokerstars. Pokerstars 1, no doubt Anyway, PS is, was and will be 1 option for a long time. August 25th, , 6: Hi, Definately Pokerstars is better. I've had issues with withdrawls and it takes them the support over 48 hours to reply to queries. August 25th, , 7: I recently signed on to Poker and I must say that so far I am enjoying the experience on that site very much.
Not so many crazy plays like I see often on Pokerstars where people go into hands with absolutely nothing and end up winning.
August 26th, , 4: I play at poker and Poker Stars. Poker Stars will always be in 1st place because of traffic software and selection of tournaments.
August 26th, , 9: August 27th, , 4: Well I have only play at Pokerstars And i think is the best for tournaments Also the software is super the best of all poker sites I think..
But I have heard a lot of Poker also and I think is the second best Poker site in traffic and software I'll be Opening an Poker Acount today and start playing there So I can give my best opinion by my own Experience!
I do not think one room is much better than the other, it's only better known than the other. August 27th, , 5: Both rooms have their own characteristics, pokerstars leads in terms of the number of games and players, ease of use and promotions for beginners, as well as a poker school in which a beginner has the chance to form, almost from scratch, his bankroll.
So to decide, it's better to try both. August 27th, , 6: Here is the largest number of poker players. Not in one other poker room there are so many playing online poker, in the evening playing about thousand players are playing. The playing field is weak. This is especially evident when playing on microliths, a lot of fish. Microlights are ideal for beginners. Depends what you are searching for. If you want to punt of and have some fun it doesn't matter the result will be the same in any room.
If you want to make money then id say poker is a better option. Poker is getting tougher every day and people chose Stars because they see large numbers of traffic and many options witch is like a mirage, the reality is the field is the hardest in the world it always has been.
At the end of the day you could make money in any room if you have the skills and put in the volume, but id always pick a softer room. Have a nice day and run good at the tables.
Pokerstars is better then poker. Obviously cause in their freerolls it's so much easier to finish ITM compared to pokerstars and so on.
Play both and like them both,hard to choose but I play more on PokerStars August 28th, , 8: I've been playing at pokerstars since I started at online poker, hence I'm so used to the interface that I really feel more comfortable when playing there.
But I do like too, been playing there from time to time and I think is the close second poker room there is. You don't really have to choose between one or the other, been using both of them and there is quite the selection of freerolls between the two to build a bankroll. August 28th, , 4: Actually I'm banned on poker like others players from Poland, therefore playing on PokerStars.
Summarizing I prefer PokerStars. August 29th, , 2: Originally Posted by ComboCC. September 16th, , 4: I think the two are very good each one has its own difference at least in terms of complexity of tournaments is pokerstars and as cash and tables is among the best.
September 16th, , 2: September 16th, , 6: Whenever something happens, they might continue an MTT 3 hours later, without any warning or headsup whatsoever. The last week has been a nightmare. I like both of these sites. Hud works fine on regular cash tables on poker, only for snap tables it's disabled. As for PP, hud is basically useless there, as PP mask players' names in hand history, so you'll get hundreds of hands on player1, player2, etc. You can review your own hands though. Party Poker has the better software with the recent update overhaul the only downside is you cant throw things at other people.
Both rooms are very good, I know all of them. If you have to choose, it is very clear to me that Party Poker. There is much greater choice in every game type. For cash games, i think is more suitable than poker. Why do not you try both of them? Party Poker is the better site. September 21st, , 2: Originally Posted by Legendary September 21st, , 4: As play advise them September 21st, , 5: They always have interesting and good promotions.
In addition, there is always the opportunity to get a good ticket for free. Party poker has a much better selection of tournaments especially KO, there are more players on fast tables. September 22nd, , I also think that PartyPoker is better than In my there more players are playing than at And he recently updated. Partypoker is better, it has some good promotions and as software itself.
September 22nd, , 1: September 22nd, , 2: My top 5 ranking: I think if you are a cash game player for me poker is much better , but in mtts I prefer Partypoker and PP software is much better. Dailon Arroyo Blandon . I have played in both places and both of them seem very good September 22nd, , 3: Haven't tried either but I'm looking to try both soon. Good to see opinions from the community here.